Integration through tenure mixing: good or bad for low-income residents?

Julia Markovich, "‘They Seem to Divide Us’: Social Mix and Inclusion in Two Traditional Urbanist Communities," Housing Studies 30 (2015): 1

The take-away: This article employs Iris Young’s (1999, 2000) critique of residential segregation and the integration ideal to frame a qualitative analysis of tenure mixing in Poundbury, Dorchester and New Gorbals in the UK. Based on interviews with residents, it is found that “the nature of integration varies by case study area, and is perhaps more nuanced in practice than Young allows” (164).

Abstract: Mixed tenure communities have become an important element of UK housing policy in recent decades. Whilst valued by policy-makers for generating a range of benefits, particularly for residents living in social rented housing, the empirical literature suggests that tenure mixing is neither a sufficient nor a reliable remedy for addressing issues associated with concentrations of poverty, disadvantage and social exclusion. This paper reports on a doctoral research study that considered tenure mixing practices at two traditional urbanist communities in the UK: Poundbury, Dorchester, and New Gorbals, Glasgow. Conceptually, the paper uses Young's critiques of residential segregation and the integration ideal to evaluate the two communities. Methodologically, it draws on qualitative interviews with residents, planners and social housing providers. The research findings contradict many aspects of Young's ideal and highlight the complex and multidimensional nature of integration in practice. Reflecting on these findings, the paper identifies five housing policy and research priorities that might usefully be pursued in future work.

Full article (requires access)